Chapter from: "Why Do Design Optimization?" by D.Spicer
It is generally recognized that the direct use of the main design data model as a unifiying agent in the design process forces it to become more seamless and integrated. This in turn tends to force clarification of the process itself, and a reduction in cycle time. In order to carry out any significant design optimization work, an automated design evaluation capability is a prerequisite. A move towards optimization therefore reinforces this beneficial trend.
It may be though that the direct use of the design data model for optimization is problematic, because currently CAD data transfer is rather slow. However, in most optimizations the amount of data being moved may well not be so large as to dominate the calculation, compared with evaluation. There is also an aspect which is an advantage. In traditional CAD work, any of the problems associated with CAD data transfer arise through transferring from one CAD system to a different one. But in the data transfer needed in optimization we are transferring from the CAD system to itself. So many of the problems and fixes, such as having to remove CAD elements which have been found to give compatibility problems, are not relevant in optimization.
It is argued that the clarification of the design’s measures of success is essential to ensuring that the design team are addressing the right set of problems for the business. The use of optimization ensures that the issue is brought clearly into focus and that the sometimes very difficult task of ensuring that sensitive areas of the problem receive their full attention.
The use of top-down design metrics implies a completeness of capability to evaluate there metrics. Not all the areas of design are currently free from difficulties in this respect.
Many engineering analysis problems exist, for example in fluid dynamics and electromagnetics, for which only a limited solution capability exists due to their needs for amounts of computing power and resource which are not available for everyday needs.
Various areas of design exist in which there are still significant challenges in developing clear agreed models of the design attributes concerned; example areas are costing and systems modelling
The complete data model of a major engineering product such as an aircraft or a ship is currently much too large to be convenient for participating in “whole design” computations.
The use of optimization enforces a need to provide design evaluation tools in all the areas of design which are key to the important design choices.
The requirement is not to make large leaps in technology overnight, but to fairly capture the ways in which the design is evaluated in practice by the design team and formally acknowledge these.
To automate idealization, and provide closer integration between the Design office and the analysis departments (Aerodynamics, Structures, Electromagnetics etc) the activities of:
have to be closely considered as part of the design process, rather than as unscheduled labor intensive and time-consuming procedures. It is typical for design data to be created to a standard which is unfit for any of the above operations. Without automation of these, full use of CAD models cannot be achieved, and even the use of analysis models will be less effective. The use of optimization will undoubtedly bring these automation issues into focus.
Top level design metrics must inevitably reflect how the product is manufactured, operated in the field, and supported. The production and operating scenarios provide a framework to bring into focus the important cost, performance and customer satisfaction issues. The scenarios to be defined may need to encompass any or all of the following areas:
Often, an organization’s know how is what keeps it in business. This know how is the collective distillation of experience from having done similar jobs before and build up knowledge of the designs. Design optimization, which allows thousands of designs to be experimented with on a computer, speeds up learning process. By trying out designs which are diverse, it promotes a broadening of knowledge of the solution possibilities and increases engineering understanding. If the results of investigating a broader design range are condensed and stored suitably, an advanced knowledge base can be built for future reference.
For many industries, time-to-market is a key issue. The ability to consider and evaluate many designs in a short period of time may confer a decisive advantage over the competition.
Watch the recordings of our annual event for the customers and professionals from the industry interested in pSeven products. Presentations from Liebherr - Aerospace, Safran Tech, CGI, CIMdata, PDTec and others are available.